The Story Of Creation As Told By Theology And By Science
T. S. (Thomas Suter) Ackland
4 chapters
3 hour read
Selected Chapters
4 chapters
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER I.
The History of the Creation with which the Bible commences, is not a mere incidental appendage to God's Revelation, but constitutes the foundation on which the whole of that Revelation is based. Setting forth as it does the relation in which man stands to God as his Maker, and to the world which God formed for his abode, it forms a necessary introduction to all that God has seen fit to reveal to us with reference to His dispensations of Providence and of Grace. It is, however, not uncommonly ass
37 minute read
Read Chapter
Read Chapter
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER II.
The principal points on which there is a supposed discrepancy between the Mosaic Record and the discoveries of geologists are as follows:— I. That the world in all its completeness, as it now exists, was moulded out of material in a chaotic state in six ordinary days. Geologists have ascertained, beyond the possibility of a doubt, that the process must have occupied countless ages. II. That the first appearance of animal life was on the fifth of those six days. Geologists have discovered that an
31 minute read
Read Chapter
Read Chapter
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER III.
These objections, so far as they are based or supposed to be based on ascertained facts, are very few and insignificant. The chief of them are as follows:— 1. Moses describes light, and the division of night and day as existing before the Creation of the Sun. 2. Moses describes the firmament as a solid vault. 3. Moses speaks of the stars as created on the fourth day, only two days before Adam, whereas astronomers have asserted that many of them are so distant that the light by which we see them
15 minute read
Read Chapter
Read Chapter
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER IV.
The third science which is supposed to come into collision with the Mosaic Record is Physiology. Here, however, we meet with no objections which rest upon ascertained facts, as in the case of geology. We have only to do with theories. All that can be brought forward is merely matter of opinion or theory—such theory resting indeed on a foundation of ascertained facts—but being in itself a mere inference more or less probable from those facts. Even if it were proved to be a true account of the cau
42 minute read
Read Chapter
Read Chapter